Read the original article here.

---

Internet Trolling: Human Behavior, Automated Replication, and The Dead Internet Files

This document explores the phenomenon of Internet trolling, analyzing its origins, characteristics, and impact. Furthermore, it examines how the concepts of human trolling intersect with the hypothesis of "The Dead Internet Files," which posits that a significant and growing portion of online activity is generated by automated bots and AI, rather than genuine human interaction. Understanding the evolution and potential automation of trolling is crucial for grasping the challenges of discerning authenticity and navigating digital spaces in the modern era.

1. Defining the Internet Troll

At its core, Internet trolling describes a specific type of disruptive online behavior.

An Internet troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or otherwise disrupting normal, on-topic discussion.

Additional Context: The key elements of this definition are the deliberate intent to provoke or disrupt. Trolling is not merely expressing a controversial opinion; it is the act of posting with the primary goal of causing a negative reaction, derailing conversations, or sowing chaos within an online space. The "emotional response" sought can range from anger and frustration to outrage or despair among other users.

2. Historical Roots and Etymology

The term "troll" in the online context dates back to the early days of the internet, specifically the Usenet newsgroups of the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Definition:

Usenet: A worldwide distributed discussion system that predates the World Wide Web. Users read and post messages to one or more categories, known as "newsgroups."

The origin of the term is debated, but two primary theories exist:

1. Fishing Analogy: The most common explanation links it to the fishing technique of "trolling," where a fisherman drags a bait or lure through the water to entice fish. Similarly, an Internet troll drags provocative or disruptive content through an online community to entice unsuspecting users into reacting.
2. Mythological Creatures: Another theory connects it to the monstrous trolls of folklore, often depicted as mischievous or malicious creatures who cause trouble.

Regardless of the exact origin, the behavior quickly became recognized and labeled within online communities as a distinct form of unwelcome participation.

3. Motivations Behind Trolling

Understanding why individuals troll is essential, as these motivations can also shed light on why bots might be programmed to mimic such behavior. Common human motivations include:

• Attention and Ego Gratification: Trolls often seek a reaction, positive or negative. The outrage or frustration they cause provides them with a sense of power or importance, validating their actions through the volume of responses they receive.
• Boredom and Amusement: For some, trolling is a form of entertainment, a way to alleviate boredom by stirring up drama and observing the reactions of others from a detached perspective.
• Ideological or Political Agenda: Some individuals troll to promote specific viewpoints, attack opposing groups, or spread disinformation. This type of trolling can be highly targeted and is often associated with organized campaigns.
• Personal Grievances or Revenge: Trolling can be used as a tool to harass specific individuals or groups against whom the troll holds a grudge.
• Social Dynamics and Group Behavior: Trolling can be encouraged or amplified within certain online subcultures where disruptive behavior is normalized or even celebrated.
• Paid or Coordinated Activity: In some cases, individuals are paid to troll, often as part of larger influence operations or smear campaigns orchestrated by organizations, corporations, or even state actors.

4. Common Trolling Tactics and Manifestations

Trolling isn't a single behavior but a spectrum of tactics aimed at disruption. Examples include:

• Flame Baiting: Posting highly provocative, aggressive, or insulting messages specifically designed to elicit angry responses ("flames") and start arguments.
• Off-Topic Disruption: Posting content that is completely irrelevant to the ongoing discussion in a forum or thread, purely to derail it.
• Concern Trolling: Masquerading as a supporter of a person, idea, or community while making comments that undermine it from within, often phrased as questions or concerns.
• Griefing (Gaming Context): Specifically in online games, griefing refers to deliberately annoying or harming other players for no reason other than to cause them distress or ruin their game experience.
• Posting Inflammatory or Offensive Content: Sharing hateful, vulgar, or deeply offensive material to shock and upset others.
• Spamming: While distinct from classic trolling, flooding a community with repetitive or unwanted messages can be a form of disruptive behavior with similar goals.
• Sockpuppeting: Creating multiple fake online identities to give the appearance of broader support for one's views, harass others from different angles, or simply amplify the noise.

Definition:

A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception. The term is derived from the manipulation of a simple hand puppet made from a sock.

Additional Context: Sockpuppeting is a tactic often employed by trolls to make their disruptive behavior seem more widespread, create fake arguments between their own accounts to draw in others, or circumvent bans from online platforms.

5. The "Dead Internet Files" Connection: From Human to Automated Disruption

The concept of "The Dead Internet Files" posits that a significant and growing proportion of online content and interaction is not generated by genuine human users but by automated scripts, bots, and AI. Within this framework, the study of human trolling becomes particularly relevant for several reasons:

• Human Trolling as a Blueprint: The patterns of human trolling behavior – provocation, repetition, emotional manipulation, spreading misinformation, disrupting discussions, using fake identities – are highly replicable by algorithms and automation. Bots can be programmed to mimic these human-like disruptive actions.
• Scalability of Disruption: While a single human troll can be annoying, a network of bots (a botnet) can perform trolling actions on an unprecedented scale. This allows for the rapid and overwhelming pollution of online spaces, making it difficult for genuine human conversation to thrive.
• Blurring Authenticity: If bots become sophisticated enough to mimic human trolling behavior convincingly, it becomes increasingly challenging for ordinary users to distinguish between a genuinely disruptive person and an automated entity. This contributes directly to the "Dead Internet Files" notion that the internet feels less human and more artificial.
• Automated Influence and Manipulation: Automated trolling isn't always just for "amusement." Bots employing trolling tactics (e.g., flooding comment sections with negative remarks about a topic or person, spreading divisive memes, creating artificial trends) can be powerful tools for political manipulation, corporate influence, or spreading disinformation on a massive scale. This moves beyond simple disruption to active, automated persuasion or suppression of genuine discourse.
• Content Pollution and Signal vs. Noise: Bot-driven trolling floods platforms with noise, making it harder to find authentic human content, reliable information, or meaningful interaction. This "pollution" contributes to the feeling that the internet is becoming a vast, unmanaged swamp of automated content, reinforcing the "deadness" hypothesis.

Example: Imagine a political discussion thread. A human troll might post a single inflammatory comment. In a "Dead Internet" scenario influenced by automated trolling, dozens or hundreds of bot accounts might suddenly appear, posting identical or similar inflammatory comments, attacking specific viewpoints with pre-programmed phrases, and upvoting/liking each other's content to give a false impression of widespread sentiment.

6. Impact and Consequences of Trolling (Human and Automated)

The effects of trolling, whether human or potentially automated, are significant and detrimental to the online ecosystem:

• Degradation of Online Discourse: Trolling makes constructive conversation difficult, driving away users who seek meaningful interaction.
• Chilling Effect: Regular users may become hesitant to participate, express opinions, or share information for fear of being targeted by trolls.
• Erosion of Trust: The presence of trolls, especially if they are perceived as potentially automated or coordinated, reduces trust in online communities and the information shared within them.
• Increased Moderation Burden: Platform administrators and community moderators face an immense challenge in identifying and dealing with trolls, a task made exponentially harder by potential automation and sockpuppetry.
• Spread of Misinformation and Hate: Trolling tactics are often used to spread false narratives, propaganda, and hateful content, contributing to real-world harm.
• The Feeling of Artificiality: As predicted by the "Dead Internet Files," the prevalence of seemingly inauthentic, disruptive interactions (many potentially automated) contributes to a sense that online spaces are less about human connection and more about programmed behavior and content.

7. Dealing with Trolling in the Age of Potential Automation

The traditional advice for dealing with human trolls is often "Don't feed the troll."

Explanation:

"Don't feed the troll" is a common online adage advising users not to respond to or interact with a troll. The rationale is that trolls seek attention and reactions; by refusing to engage, users deny the troll the satisfaction they seek, thus discouraging the behavior.

While this advice can still be relevant for individual human trolls, it becomes more complex when considering potential automated trolling:

• Bots Don't Need Feeding (in the Human Sense): Automated trolls aren't seeking emotional satisfaction in the way a human might. They are performing a programmed task (e.g., posting a certain number of messages, spreading a specific phrase, disrupting a topic). Ignoring a bot might not stop it from continuing its programmed activity.
• Difficulty in Identification: The primary challenge for individuals is often identifying whether the disruptive account is human or automated. Applying the "don't feed" rule to a sophisticated bot might be less effective than platform-level detection and intervention.
• Platform-Level Solutions are Crucial: Combating automated trolling requires sophisticated technical solutions from platform providers, including AI-driven detection of inauthentic behavior, botnet identification, rate limiting, and proactive removal of fake accounts and coordinated activity.
• Community Reporting Remains Important: Even if dealing with potential bots, users reporting suspicious behavior provides valuable data for platform moderation systems.

8. Conclusion

Internet trolling, initially a human-driven behavior rooted in early online communities, has evolved into a significant challenge for digital spaces. As hypothesized by "The Dead Internet Files," the potential for these disruptive tactics to be replicated and amplified by automated bots and AI creates a new layer of complexity. Automated trolling can scale disruption, spread misinformation efficiently, and contribute to the unsettling sense that much of the internet is becoming artificial.

Understanding human trolling provides a crucial foundation for recognizing the patterns that automated systems might mimic. The ongoing challenge for users, researchers, and platform providers is to develop better ways to identify and mitigate the impact of disruptive behavior, regardless of whether its source is human intent or automated execution, in an increasingly complex and potentially "dead" digital landscape. The fight against trolling is, in essence, a fight for the authenticity and integrity of online interaction.